Throw away your experiences of success Taro should have worked instead of playing by Nada 20230929

Hello. It's Nada. Today's topic is about not holding back when something goes well. In this world, there are people who always brag about their glory after hitting the jackpot. These people have the great experience of getting one hit, but in many cases that experience hits a ceiling and they can't move on. I also spent five years worrying about how to solve prime factorization, which I wrote about in an article a few days ago, so when it worked out, I was not surprised and happy, but... I was humbled and thought, ``Let's move on quickly.'' There's nothing wrong with being successful, but if you stop at that point, you'll end up wasting 5 or 10 years. There's something chilling about the Urashima Taro-like story where 30 years pass without any progress and then he realizes he's an old man.

Now, I would like to continue talking about Urashima Taro for a moment, but I think it would have been better for Urashima Taro to have worked hard as an employee of Ryugu Castle instead of playing around with Otohime and the others. Princess Otohime would not have sent her a treasure box, and her second life should have been waiting for her in the earthly world after that. Although her biological parents were no longer alive, there was no way she could have been saved. Rumors about past glory last for 75 days, so let go of your thoughts in two and a half months and start piling up stones all over again. Of course, if it means I can experience great success and have fun with it for a living, I won't stop. Enjoy your life. However, if you want to enjoy the sense of fulfillment that comes from work, which is a big part of your life, put money aside and work. He must be the one who knows best that he is no longer at the stage where he wants to work to the death. He should work hard, live a long and healthy life, and become a person who is respected by the people around him. If so, experiencing success will be the first step towards stepping up from the disappointing things that are holding you back. If you succeed once, try to reproduce it. And be successful in other ways. Your life will become richer. See you soon.

Negotiation is the origin of all human relationships Try to offer benefits to your competitors by Nada 20230928

Hello. This is Nada! It may seem sudden, but discussion is important. There are many issues that can be resolved through discussion. I also think that a solution through discussion is much better than a solution by force. Of course, that's an ideal situation, but in reality, sparks might be flying everywhere and it might not be much of a conversation. Speaking of fireworks, when Tamaya and a locksmith discuss who should sell the fireworks and at what price, they end up being referred to the prosecutor's office on suspicion of being part of a cartel. Negotiation is important, but it's not everything, and there must of course be other ways to resolve the issue other than arguing.

I think that the more people you consider to be enemies, the more effective your negotiations will be. To negotiate, you must present the benefits to the other party. The advantage should not be a disadvantage that is unacceptable to this side, and it is desirable that there is also an advantage to this side. When there is an argument between one side and the other side, neither side understands the situation objectively. Even if the wig was out of place, the other party would not know about it and would claim it was my fault. What I want to say is that in order to settle a dispute, a third party is needed who can calmly weigh up the arguments of both sides. The disputes between the parties become heated and it becomes impossible to make calm decisions. In society, lawyers step in at such times and teach us how to negotiate.

It's not often that you simply like someone. The reason we like each other is because there are benefits for us as well. If the other party is willing to go along with you, then you are also providing benefits. It is said that it is not a good idea to calculate things on a profit and loss basis, but we are wired to prefer people who give us profits over people who cause us losses. If you want to move a difficult opponent with your own strength, it is better to provide benefits that outweigh the costs involved in moving the opponent. When you want someone to take action, it might be a good idea to first consider whether you are providing benefits. See you soon.

A simple method of prime factorization. Pull mod from mod!? In fact, I will explain what is correct by looking at the movement of numerical valuesby Nada 20230926

Hello. This is Nada from Seito Medical School. This time, we will talk about a powerful tool that performs prime factorization. Prime factorization? I've never heard of it. Look at the reality now. Get out of bed, brush your teeth, and go to school. yes. Look at reality. Let's start with something realistic. Prime factorization is a difficult problem to solve, similar to the one used in cryptography. This problem is related to a difficult mathematical problem called PvsNP, and current computers cannot solve the RSA encryption, which is a code for decomposition of prime factors. So, let's solve prime factorization using a new methodology. First of all, the tool we use is a mod. mod is also called remainder operation and is a tool related to remainders. 54=3mod17 indicates that the remainder when 54 is divided by 17 is 3. Furthermore, the problem 17×11=187 means that when a=11, there are 17 a's. Let's introduce a new way of thinking or a new set of values. mod3 means divide by 3. If you divide a multiple of 3 by 3, the remainder is 0. In other words, when 3a out of 11a is divided by 3, the remainder is 0. 17a=14a mod 3. If it is mod5, 5a=0mod5, 17a=12a mod5. What happens if we subtract these two equations? 11×17=1mod3, 11×17=2mod5. (1mod3)-(2mod5)=2a. In other words, 14a-12a=2a. Furthermore, arbitrarily, (2mod5)-(7mod9)=4a.

Here, subtract (2mod5)-(7mod9)=4a from both equations (1mod3)-(2mod5)=2a.

Then, (1mod3)+(7mod9) = -2a+(4mod5).

Here, 1mod3 means 11×17-11×3=154=1mod3, and 7mod9 means 11×17-11×9=88=7mod9, so the left side is 154+88=242. 4mod5 is 2mod5+2mod5, so 11×17 is multiplied twice. That is, (11×17-11×5)x2=264=4mod5. Looking at the total, it becomes 154+88=(-2)x11+242.

Now add (1mod3) and (7mod9). There are two 11x17s, so (11x17x2)mod(3+9)=2mod12=154+88=242. This is because we know that the number that can be calculated using this method is 11×17=187.

Then, (1mod3)+(7mod9)=(2mod12)= -2a+(4mod5).

This becomes (2mod12)-(4mod5)=242-264=-2a. (2mod12)-(11×17-4-5a)=-2a.

22-183mod12=7mod12=-7a, so (-7×7)a=(7×7)mod12. a=(-1)mod12=11mod12.

a=11, b=17, axb =187

Get feedback The desire for approval is a higher order of desire and a great motivation

Hello. It's Tenkaze.

Do many office workers receive feedback from their superiors and those around them? When you input something and produce an output called performance, you want feedback from someone. If the feedback is to the point and correct, it can help you correct your behavior. When I work for a company, I get instant feedback. When I create some materials or come up with an idea, I don't keep it to myself, but rather make it known as my idea.

I'm sure some of you would like to save your ideas and use them as go-inro in an emergency to get a high reputation. Normally, you may want to keep your ideas hidden and push them forward as your own accomplishments when they are most effective. In that sense, I think we are in a situation where we cannot expect appropriate feedback right away even if we come up with an idea. Even if you win a prize like a certain candy, if you keep it to yourself, you will never receive the prize no matter how long it takes.

Personally, I think that ideas that come up with great effort should be actively presented to the public. Even if one idea is taken away by a superior, if the idea is taken for granted by someone in a higher-ranking position, you can continue to mass-produce new ideas instead of giving them away. After all, in the long run, people who don't hesitate to share their ideas with those around them will have richer imagination and gain greater experience. People don't die just because one or two ideas are taken away. Above all, if you make your ideas known, you will receive feedback. Which parts were good and which parts were bad? Later on, that feedback will become the basis for new ideas, creating a positive idea-feedback loop.

Feedback is important. For some people, just pitching an idea and hearing your boss praise you for a job well done and give you some Chupa Chups can give some people a lot of energy. This is called a need for approval, and it is a high-level need among other needs. If you can get approval, you will have a synergistic effect with your work, and you will always be in a state of giving feedback to yourself about how you can achieve better results.

In the end, the potential for growth is different from being greedy and valuing one idea and proposing one idea after another, thinking it's a given that you won't get anything. The same holds true when teaching other employees how to do their job. If you keep all your knowledge and experience to yourself, you will not be able to experience anything further. Therefore, those who are willing to share their knowledge and experience with their subordinates will be able to gain experience as a manager, and they will also feel a sense of urgency to study further and acquire higher-level skills. At that time, there will be a huge difference in skills between those who willingly share their skills with those around them and those who stubbornly stick to their own skills. Ah, this absurdly unequal society. The world is doing well. In the end, the people who gain the most are those who share what they have with others and are not greedy. I think the people around me, myself included, would unanimously support such people. See you soon.

Science is an approximation of the world, but in terms of generating novel ideas that have never existed before, ask the dragon for help

 This is Watanabe Tenmei from Seito Medical School Clear File. This time's theme is about cryptography. There are various types of codes. Major ones include RSA encryption and SHA256. I'm not a professional researcher, but I do research as a hobby. Many people think that research means poring over difficult technical books and papers and coming up with far-fetched theories. I myself wondered if there was an easy way to find 13 and 7 from 91 in the case of 13 x 7 = 91 using the formula prime number x prime number = composite number. 91 is a two-digit number, but if it reaches 700 digits, that is, if there are 700 0s after the 1, it is impossible to decipher it on a computer. Of course, recent advances in decoding technology have led to the development of quantum computers.

I have fond memories of research that I cannot express in this article alone. I immersed myself in research from the time I got home from work until late at night, and although I never fell asleep due to fatigue, it was difficult to wake up in the morning because of the short amount of sleep I had. Fortunately, I wasn't late for work, so I would like to congratulate myself. Watanabe-kun, you're doing your best, aren't you? At that rate, I would like to double the sales target for last month next month. In terms of research, I created various tools that were easy for me to use, and I was under the illusion that I still had a lot of room for improvement.

Now, returning to the topic of codes, there was a methodology that was named the Tower of Druaga for solving codes. By repeatedly taking the difference between numbers and substituting them, you will run up the stairs of the tower using manual labor and internet tools. When I was about to let go, I had the experience of thinking about a methodology for prime factorization, thinking that there might be another methodology. However, this is all in the past. 

The research I will be working on from now on is a game about the impact that dragons, which look like large children, have on the ecosystem. Its power is outstanding, and by combining three random elements (the number doesn't matter whether it's four or five), I came up with two new products that I didn't know if they would sell in 5 or 6 minutes. If you have a product that seems likely to sell, it might be fun to try calculating it from a business perspective. If we can sell this much with only this cost, we'll be in the black, and we'll have to assemble this part and that part in the first place... Personally, I think I can stay immersed in it for a long time (lol).

What I want to say is that science can be a means to solve something, or it can be a chain that binds you. If you are always confused by fixed ideas of science, you will not be able to think about other simple solutions. Therefore, instead of a science that seeks to approximate nature, we need a dragon that creates what is not found in nature. I hope that if dragons influence the ecosystem, it will have a positive effect. Furthermore, the method of decomposing equations into simple equations such as A=B and C=D, and reassembling them can also be expected to bring great progress to humanity. The scientific mystery of taking 3 steps forward and 2 steps back can be said to be wasteful if you take 5 or 6 steps forward without going back all at once. Of course, you will also need to make an effort to prove that all of your ideas are correct. I never fail, so it would be safer to research carefully before saying anything.

By the way, samples of the impact dragons have on the ecosystem are ``a machine that automatically moves and sprinkles water on fields and golf courses like a Roomba'' and ``a dessert of deep-fried watermelon, placed on a skewer, and served with ice cream''. . What did you all think of this story? The possibility that things that do not exist at all in the universe will be born one after another may keep the world rolling. If you have time, please try it out. See you soon.

There is a prime number x prime number cipher, but I tried to create a cipher that is prime number + prime number = prime number by Nada 20230925

Hello. It's tears. This time I will talk about a code that I devised.

I have been researching cryptography for a long time. N-queen problem, cracking RSA cryptography, quantum-resistant cryptography, etc. As Descartes pointed out in his ``Introduction to Method'', I think it would be best to start solving the N-queen problem by solving a 4x4 grid of N-queens, as Descartes said, ``Divide the difficulty into parts.'' There are two solutions for N queen in 4x4 squares. There are 92 solutions for N queen of 8x8 squares. I found solving codes to be as fun as solving puzzles, but at the same time I was also researching the weaknesses of codes, so I think I have a good idea of ​​what types of codes are difficult to crack. For example, RSA encryption is a prime factorization of prime number x prime number, but I don't think it's bad to use a code that says prime number x2 + prime number = prime number. Of course, you can easily find the solution by just adding this prototype. I would like to consider a cipher like (31)x2+(47)=(109). Since 109 is a public key encryption, it is made public in advance. The problem is to find 31 and 47 (31 and 47 are the so-called private keys or passwords), but 109 can also be found by (3)x2+(103)=(109). That's why I use mods. Mod is used to calculate the remainder; if 54=3mod17, the remainder when 54 is divided by 17 is 3. For example, (3mod14)x2+(13mod17)=109. Even if 3mod14 becomes a prime number, 13mod17 becomes a prime number at the same time, so you need to add the two together to get 109. By the way, 31=3mod14, 47=13mod17. The problem is the uniqueness of prime factorization, that is, whether it is possible to reduce the number of solutions to one. Furthermore, if we set prime number (mod) + prime number (mod) + prime number (mod) = prime number, the cipher becomes even more difficult to solve.

I don’t need male friends Are men subordinates or bosses? Women can be friends by Nada 20230925

Hello. It's tears. Today we're talking about friendship between men, or friendship between men and women. Please understand that this is my personal opinion as it may be based on my own biases.

I don't think I need male friends. Of course, if you're a student, it might be nice to have same-sex male friends. You can say that this is because being a student is a special period where everything is forgiven just by studying. However, some people become so busy with work that they have no time to hang out with friends. I work so hard that I don't have time to study or play even on holidays. There will be many people like this.

I believe that the majority of relationships among working adults are work-related. Even if you work for a good white company, you will spend 8 hours a day, or 2000 hours a year, at work. For this reason, working adults are increasingly involved in relationships between their superiors and subordinates at work. Of course, there are also contemporaries. They may have started working at the same company in the same year and may have a relationship where they occasionally drink alcohol. After 5 or 10 years, you should be able to figure out which of you is on the path to advancement.

"Ah, that guy from my class is more successful than me." If that's the case, a hierarchical relationship will likely emerge among the classmates. I think friendships between men of the same sex should never be underestimated. Even if a person is very popular with women, if something really bothers them, the person who will reach out to them may be a man of the same sex. On top of that, I think it's more rational to think of men in terms of hierarchical relationships rather than as equals. This is because in order for men to be equal, they need a special relationship, such as when they were students at the same university without any job title.

However, once you start working, you'll find that you'll find a variety of things to compare with, such as whether that person's company is bigger or whether he's already a section manager. In my case, I generally don't look down on others or look up at them. Everyone is equal. However, as members of society, there is always something called status. So, when we compare them based on their status, we end up thinking that I'm better than them based on a certain standard, or that he's not as successful as me. Based on that standard, the other party probably feels the same way.

On top of that, men of the same gender will naturally compare themselves. If this is the case, a hierarchical relationship will emerge. But what about women of the opposite sex? I think it is difficult to compare men with women in terms of which career path is best for them. Even if women are promoted, it doesn't necessarily mean that they recognize the equality of men and women these days or their abilities. Today's society is definitely male-dominated. Therefore, even if women are promoted higher in the ranks, you should not honestly think that it is because of a difference in ability. This may be the reason why men and women tend to have a special hierarchical relationship.

Friendship between men and women is simple. The question is whether you can tolerate having a partner whose boyfriend is the other woman. If a woman doesn't care if she has another boyfriend, then a friendship between a man and a woman would be possible. However, this is often the most difficult aspect of friendship between men and women.

I would like to summarize my opinion here. Personally, I don't look down on anyone or look up at anyone. Everyone is equal. However, depending on the roles given by society, hierarchical relationships arise. It is up to each person to set aside this hierarchical relationship and decide whether they still see it as equality or whether a hierarchical relationship exists. On top of that, it's up to you whether you can ignore romance and get involved with a woman of the opposite sex. In the end, each person's opinion is different, and that's what allows society to function. This is one conclusion for me. What do you think. See you soon.